|
|
Post by jaguars19 on Jul 7, 2010 19:10:41 GMT -5
AFC top 6:
1.Steelers
2.Jags
3.Phins(SB)
4.Broncos
5.Browns
6.Bolts
-------------
Ravs
Begs
Colts
NFC top 6:
1. Cards(SB)
2. Eagles(SB)
3. Viks
4. Seahawks
5. Panthers
6. Lions
--------------
Saints
9ers
Packers
|
|
|
|
Post by gamepat2008 on Jul 7, 2010 19:12:58 GMT -5
AFC has the best conference because of a lot of great teams and coaches
NFC do have some great teams (Eagles, Panthers, Cards, Seahawks) but the middle and low teams are worse.
|
|
|
|
Post by Claxxxton on Jul 8, 2010 11:17:49 GMT -5
NFC 2 Superbowls
AFC 1 Superbowl
HOLY SHIT I HAD A BRILLIANT IDEA.......With like 10 ppl being able to play on the same team in the new madden I think that the top finishers from each division should play together in the ProBowl. AFC vs NFC....that would be epic
|
|
|
|
Post by 49ers on Jul 17, 2010 19:15:06 GMT -5
afc obviously has stronger teams
|
|
|
|
Post by 49ers on Jul 17, 2010 21:00:31 GMT -5
the afc is deeper
|
|
|
|
Post by 49ers on Jul 17, 2010 21:49:43 GMT -5
theres more quality teams
|
|
|
|
Post by reaganrebellion on Jul 18, 2010 14:51:07 GMT -5
The people have spoken, and they think Cards is a moron.
|
|
|
|
Post by majestic1juan on Jul 18, 2010 16:48:04 GMT -5
fuck the people. nfc > afc
|
|
|
|
Post by Colts (ScarletnGray33) on Jul 18, 2010 16:59:47 GMT -5
The superbowls argument really makes no sense at all in regards to talking about the best conference overall... just because the nfc had the best team in the league for 2/3 seasons doesn't mean that the conference as a whole was better.
It's all about matchups, and just because the NFC representative beat the AFC rep, that doesn't mean the NFC champ could beat team 2 or team 3 in the AFC. Like I said, it's all about matchups. Looking at an overall NFC vs AFC record would be MUCH MORE relevant than looking at Super Bowls. That's just stupid.
|
|
|
|
Post by majestic1juan on Jul 18, 2010 19:40:23 GMT -5
be impossible to look at all afc vs. nfc games at a whole, and either way the whole goal of a team is to win it all, the conference that does so is obviously the best team in the league.
|
|
|
|
Post by 49ers on Jul 18, 2010 22:53:21 GMT -5
The superbowls argument really makes no sense at all in regards to talking about the best conference overall... just because the nfc had the best team in the league for 2/3 seasons doesn't mean that the conference as a whole was better. It's all about matchups, and just because the NFC representative beat the AFC rep, that doesn't mean the NFC champ could beat team 2 or team 3 in the AFC. Like I said, it's all about matchups. Looking at an overall NFC vs AFC record would be MUCH MORE relevant than looking at Super Bowls. That's just stupid. this |
|
|
|
Post by Colts (ScarletnGray33) on Jul 19, 2010 10:40:06 GMT -5
be impossible to look at all afc vs. nfc games at a whole, and either way the whole goal of a team is to win it all, the conference that does so is obviously the best team in the league. So when Ohio State wins the National Championship in college football, the Big Ten is the best conference nationwide?? No. It's not. Simply looking at SuperBowls is just a blind and ignorant way of looking at it.. An AFC vs NFC breakdown would be much more comprehensive and legit. |
|
|
|
Post by Saints (Line up n my slot) on Jul 19, 2010 16:13:21 GMT -5
Well, I've never lost to an AFC team. I think.
|
|
