|
Post by tortoise on Mar 9, 2010 20:08:41 GMT -5
Raiders Trade Seymour LE 94OVR 5th,6th,and 7th round draft picks Carlisle RG 81 ovr
chargers trade
dielman LG 95 ovr
|
|
|
Post by 49ers on Mar 9, 2010 20:10:12 GMT -5
ok im indecisive as fuck so now i accept rofl
|
|
|
Post by Vikings(Platy) on Mar 9, 2010 20:39:12 GMT -5
Is this trade serious? Really?
Just to clarify, I know Chargers backed out, but I'd like to discuss the stupidity that is this trade.
The Raiders give up a stud D-Lineman, one of the best in the league. 3 draft picks, albeit high rounds, but no matter the round there's a chance to find a diamond in the rough. And I know that you feel that you're struggling on the O-line, but maybe you should have thought about WHICH lineman are struggling before just offering up one of the only ones that HASN'T allowed a sack all season. Think about your trades before offering up a ridiculous amount just to get 1 player. Jesus fucking christ, how Raiders could have offered this trade just boggles my mind.
/endrant
|
|
|
Post by reaganrebellion on Mar 9, 2010 21:32:08 GMT -5
oh god
|
|
|
Post by tortoise on Mar 9, 2010 21:45:31 GMT -5
Is this trade serious? Really? Just to clarify, I know Chargers backed out, but I'd like to discuss the stupidity that is this trade. The Raiders give up a stud D-Lineman, one of the best in the league. 3 draft picks, albeit high rounds, but no matter the round there's a chance to find a diamond in the rough. And I know that you feel that you're struggling on the O-line, but maybe you should have thought about WHICH lineman are struggling before just offering up one of the only ones that HASN'T allowed a sack all season. Think about your trades before offering up a ridiculous amount just to get 1 player. Jesus fucking christ, how Raiders could have offered this trade just boggles my mind. /endrant I don't see what your point is since I don't really need seymour I don't wanna have to deal with the draft and dielman is 10x better then carlisle so I don't understand what your trying to say.
|
|
|
Post by reaganrebellion on Mar 9, 2010 22:00:20 GMT -5
The point is that you have SEVERELY undervalued your players
|
|
|
Post by tortoise on Mar 9, 2010 22:28:39 GMT -5
meh this trade would be worth it to have pretty much the best o-line in the league besides seymour doesn't make many outstanding plays so seems fair to me but whatever chargers dosen't know what he wants to do so i'll go ahead say myself that this trade is void.
|
|
|
Post by 49ers on Mar 9, 2010 22:32:48 GMT -5
im down to do it people just need to vote. its not that big a deal carlsie is not very good i dont care what madden stats say. its pretty much a straight up deal seymour for dielman and some draft picks.
|
|
|
Post by tortoise on Mar 9, 2010 22:46:49 GMT -5
well if we get three approvels i'll do it otherwise whatever. either way I really don't care anymore.
|
|
|
Post by 49ers on Mar 9, 2010 22:47:36 GMT -5
yeah its all good
|
|
|
Post by reaganrebellion on Mar 9, 2010 22:54:42 GMT -5
What is the trade I am supposed to be approving the original one or a different one now
|
|
|
Post by 49ers on Mar 9, 2010 22:59:19 GMT -5
nah its still the same one
|
|
|
Post by reaganrebellion on Mar 9, 2010 23:31:36 GMT -5
I can't approve
|
|
|
Post by 49ers on Mar 10, 2010 1:09:59 GMT -5
np
|
|
|
Post by Cowboys (Optcommish Prime) on Mar 10, 2010 1:43:49 GMT -5
this is just rediculous. and if you think one guy will give you the best oline, you havent seen my oline. 2 in the 90s, 2 high 80s and young and 1 80.
you just need to run different plays and not hold onto the ball as much to avoid getting sacked
|
|